The watch is from about 1951-52 and the movment is a 10BM.
Kind regards
mybulova_admin
Posted October 21, 2013 - 5:18am
airborne
Posted October 21, 2013 - 6:14am
airborne
Posted October 21, 2013 - 6:16am
mybulova_admin
Posted October 21, 2013 - 6:24am
airborne
Posted October 21, 2013 - 6:57am
FifthAvenueRes…
Posted October 21, 2013 - 2:54pm
airborne
Posted October 21, 2013 - 3:35pm
JP
Posted October 21, 2013 - 8:13pm
bourg01
Posted October 22, 2013 - 9:22pm
OldTicker
Posted October 22, 2013 - 9:58pm
I would agree with bourg01, many time all that is needed is a crystal replacement, the macro photos really highlight the flaws, the problem is that there is no real depth preception in photos.
I bought a few that I thought were just parts watches with crappy dials, and when in hand they looked totally different...the dials were the best part!