Bulova 1929 -Unknown

5/10 votes
Model ID rating explained.
Manufacture Year: 
Movement Symbol: 
Movement Model: 
Movement Jewels: 
Movement Serial No.: 
Case Serial No.: 
Case shape: 
Crystal Details: 
17.3MM Top/Bottom, 21.0mm Mid, 24.6 Long
Additional Information: 

Case PAT.JUN.10.1924 14K Gold Fil

This watch was mistakenly thought to be a Templar.



Not For Sale
Bulova watch
1929 Bulova watch
Posted February 6, 2011 - 2:53am

Club 5000Panel Member

I like your nail polish Wayne... but don't you think it's more of a "summer" color?

Posted February 6, 2011 - 9:54am


Wayne Hanley's picture
Wayne Hanley
Posted February 6, 2011 - 4:14pm

It's the dainty look! I forget what year!


Posted February 6, 2011 - 4:14pm

Club 5000Panel Member

Haha.... good sport Wayne.

Terry K.
Posted August 24, 2011 - 1:05am

NIce nails  err-ah  watch! I love the band.

I have one on a watch in the shop right now, will post when done.


Posted August 24, 2011 - 8:13am

Panel Member

Nice watch but I don't see it as a match for a Templar. The Templar is narrower and the difference is easily seen in the dial configuration.

Wayne Hanley's picture
Wayne Hanley
Posted August 24, 2011 - 7:15pm

I have two Templars & the cases are the same.

Left is 1929     Middle is 1929 Dial  Minutes chapter of 1927 right looks wider.  So you are saying it doesn't match the ad or that these are not Templar watches? I seem to be having this same problem  with my hard copy Mercury & the ad. It's a shame the bulova designers couldn't match the ads. LOL

Posted August 25, 2011 - 2:29am

Club 5000Panel Member

Wayne do you have the original image for the ad? Is it in the database? It may have been resized/squished thus giving the ad a long narrow look.

Here's the same image stretched horizontally. Just a thought.

Posted August 25, 2011 - 7:15am

Club 5000Panel Member

Ok scrap that idea....I should have done my homework first.

Ad clearly shows that it is skinner than your standard tonneau.

Posted August 25, 2011 - 7:03am

Panel Member

I don't think it matches the ad but admin brings up a good point about the images. Could just be the way the artist did that rendition. To me the dial looks more like that of the Banker though I know this isn't a Banker. I'm gonna take another good look at the ads and see if I see anything that I think may be closer to a match though I have no doubt you've already been very thourgh.