Bulova 1940 Calhoun

5/10 votes
Model ID rating explained.
2.406
Manufacture Year: 
1940
Movement Symbol: 
Omega
Movement Model: 
10AE
Movement Jewels: 
21
Case Serial No.: 
0369300
Case shape: 
Stepped
Crystal Details: 
Ben-Hur/Calhoun
Gender: 
Mens
Additional Information: 

Lovely vintage Speidel No. 58 GP band, this is either the Ben-Hur or the Calhoun.

Case back outside has "Bulova10K gold filled" at one end and the serial no. at the other end.

Very nice, clean dial and hands, very light wear to case back, case front hardly any wear to gold fill.

Case dimensions are 36mm X 26mm, lugs 13mm gape, both sides. Crystal roughly  27.5 X 17.5mm.

Photos by seller, Davethedrums, as I cannot get pics from my new camera to upload.

 

Not For Sale
Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova watch
OldTicker
Posted October 30, 2012 - 8:23pm

It starting to look like a Calhoun...I have a Ben Hur in the database, I will dig it out for case measurments to compare.

mybulova_admin
Posted November 4, 2012 - 3:19am

Club 5000Panel Member

Calhoun, exact match for me.

Ben Hur has an engraved case.

William Smith's picture
William Smith
Posted November 4, 2012 - 4:30am

Club 5000Panel Member

1936 ad engraved case.

1937 ad engraved case.

1938 ad non-engraved case. (click on ad for example record)

1939 ad engraved case.

Geoff Baker
Posted November 4, 2012 - 6:58am

Club 5000Panel Member

Vote switch, I'm all in now for Calhoun

FifthAvenueRestorations's picture
FifthAvenueRest...
Posted November 5, 2012 - 12:49pm

I think both Models are one and the same the difference being all 4 ads for the 'BEN HUR' show and describe a "link bracelet", the 'CALHOUN' is shown on Leather.

 

 

William Smith's picture
William Smith
Posted November 5, 2012 - 3:33pm

Club 5000Panel Member

Yes Nova and others discussed this distinction before, if I remember correctly.  So there's an engraved and an unengraved Ben Hur. Ads indicate this is possibly by "year", but I'm thinking there were both for the full range of years for which we have ads.  The difference btwn Ben Hur and Calhoun, as suggested by the Calhoun ad graphic, is the Calhoun is shown on that three-strip leather strap. 
Another hum-dinger.
Anybody wanna try to add up the votes and summarize below?  LOL  It gets challenging to do so.

EDIT: OT was gonna update a couple records he has for similar w/ case dimensions, and Lisa has case dimensions listed on her site.

FifthAvenueRestorations's picture
FifthAvenueRest...
Posted November 5, 2012 - 3:42pm

We have Case dimensions here on site.

Engraved Case - 36mm x 26mm non inclusive of the Crown.

Matching the subject.

William Smith's picture
William Smith
Posted November 5, 2012 - 4:44pm

Club 5000Panel Member

Yes above matches the dimensions of the subject watch. ..but which of the two model choices are these two records?   Are there other watches which look similar, but may have different dimensions?  This could indicate there's a difference in size between the Ben Hur/ Calhoun- which otherwise look similar.  I don't remember what crystal spesc say between the two.  I'll re-read again..... It's almost like I have a crystal specs learning disability  LOL. 

bourg01
Posted November 11, 2012 - 7:18pm

Panel Member

Given the material presented, I'm all in with " Calhoun ".

William Smith's picture
William Smith
Posted November 15, 2012 - 7:10pm

Club 5000Panel Member

I'm going with Unknown.  This is only because we don't have an ID name for a "Calhoun and/or Ben Hur".  I think this is one of those examples where the mount makes the model (not variant).  I see there's an unengraved Ben Hur in the ads in 1938, but the unengraved Calhoun ad in root record is also dated 1938. 

If I completely disregard the mount, I couldn't say if it's the Calhoun or Ben Hur....But I'd say it was both if we had that choice.