Bulova 1947 Ambassador "A"

7/10 votes
Model ID rating explained.
2.01
Variant: 
A
Manufacture Year: 
1947
Movement Model: 
Unknown
Case Serial No.: 
7540394
Case shape: 
Rectangle
Case Manufacturer: 
Bulova
Gender: 
Mens
Not For Sale
Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova Watch
Bulova Watch
Bulova Watch
FifthAvenueRestorations's picture
FifthAvenueRest...
Posted September 19, 2011 - 6:07am

Can We confirm that this Watch is the 'A' variant?

bourg01
Posted September 19, 2011 - 12:56pm

Panel Member

Hi Pascal,

Back in the day, that was very expensive. I've also added the gold content specs under Fifth's response.

My vote is Ambassador, which variant remains a question mark.

Regards Shawn

pascal's picture
pascal
Posted January 29, 2012 - 7:07am

Thank's Wayne! A bit late.....!Sorry!!!I 'm back on the site 'cause I just got a new Bulova I gonna post soon on this site  to get some informations!A gorgeous one as well!!!

 

FifthAvenueRestorations's picture
FifthAvenueRest...
Posted January 29, 2012 - 7:43am

pascal,

I would change the ID of this Watch to simply 'AMBASSADOR' until We can verify or disprove the 'A' variant.

William Smith's picture
William Smith
Posted July 26, 2012 - 8:35pm

Club 5000Panel Member

two ticks for A variant sans ad

FifthAvenueRestorations's picture
FifthAvenueRest...
Posted November 11, 2012 - 7:31pm

Will,

What ad may that be? 

and

based on what We know today should the Watch not be listed as manufactured in 1947?

William Smith's picture
William Smith
Posted November 11, 2012 - 5:18pm

Club 5000Panel Member

TO DELETE AFTER RECORD UPDATE
I've re-entered this record into the new database format.  I have not changed any model name or variant call- simply transfered existing data into the new format.  The info like the jewel count or movement model are not shown, nor are they listed anywhere in the text of comments, so I leave these fields as Unknown if they are a required entry. It doens't matter if we "think" this watch "should" have a 21 jewel movement - if that info is not obvious in the record- I'm not editing things based on what I "think" it should be.

DarHin's picture
DarHin
Posted November 12, 2012 - 2:40am

Yes, '47, based on case serial #. 2 ticks '47 Ambassador due to missing movement info.

bobbee's picture
bobbee
Posted November 12, 2012 - 3:54am

Agreed.