Bulova 1959 Senator

Submitted by M Watchman on March 10, 2020 - 10:41pm
B
Manufacture Year
1959
Movement Model
11AF
Movement Jewels
17
Case Serial No.
D520741
Case shape
Tonneau
Case color
Yellow
Case Manufacturer
Bulova
Gender
Mens
Watch Description

Yellow metal case with SS back.  Back of case marked, "Bulova" with the date code.  Then "10K R.G.P. Bezel", "Stainless Steel Back" and the serial number across. Inside of case marked, "Bulova", "Fifth Ave", "New York". Yellow Metal Band Caps with ss back.  Marked with "Speidel"on back link (in two directions) only.  It is "OK".  Probably will replace with leather if I cannot find the correct band. Last serviced in 2010 with synthetic oil.  Runs great.  I wear occasionally. 

Appears to be a 1959 Senator "B"

Face
Movement
Dial
Case Back
Andersok
Posted March 11, 2020 - 6:58am

I'd agree this is the Senator 'B' from 1959. Looks to be in nice condition.

M Watchman
Posted March 11, 2020 - 9:08am

In reply to by Andersok

Yes, the photo's do not do it justice.  Nice and bright, and runs very well......looks and runs like new!

Kathy L.
Posted March 11, 2020 - 9:37am

Yes took a peek at the line book 1958-1959_LineBook_BAWD0136 page 21 and it does match a Senator "B"

1959 Bulova Senator "B"

neetstuf-4-u
Posted March 11, 2020 - 1:44pm

1959 Bulova Senator "B"

JimDon5822
Posted March 11, 2020 - 2:25pm

1953 Bulova Senator "B" The Des Moines Register (Des Moines, Iowa) · 14 Jun 1959, Sun

1959 Senator B

M Watchman
Posted March 11, 2020 - 4:12pm

Does everyone mean 1959???  Watch is fully dated 1959 and the reference material seems to be from 59....

Somehow 1953 crept into peoples comments....

neetstuf-4-u
Posted March 11, 2020 - 4:17pm

In reply to by M Watchman

It's called follow the leader instead of going to the top of the page. I am guilty as well and have edited my initial identification post Sorry about that :o)

1959

Kathy L.
Posted March 12, 2020 - 3:10pm

In reply to by M Watchman

That was probably me looking at the date code without my reading glasses on, oops ;) corrected