Bulova 1926 -Non-Conforming

Submitted by Spartcom5 on December 24, 2020 - 9:23am
Manufacture Year
1926
Movement Model
10AN
Movement Date Code
Triangle
Movement Jewels
15
Movement Serial No.
192713
Case Serial No.
245797
Case shape
Square
Case color
White
Case Manufacturer
Other
Gender
Mens
Watch Description

I am interested in this watch but it seems off to me or at least I can't find any examples online. I am trying to make sense of it and hope you all can help out!! I believe I see a triangle date code for 1926 but am not sure. The dial is definitely redone and the black enamel seems to be newer perhaps? Also, the hinge on the case is missing. Thanks!

12/23/20
12/23/20
12/23/20
12/23/20
JimDon5822
Posted December 24, 2020 - 2:39pm

Hi Spartacom.  Good to see you active here.   I am Jim the guy you met at the flea market a few years ago from Tnet.  Glad to see you are still out there hunting for treasures.  This is a beauty.  I will defer to the period experts on this one.   Great watch!  

neetstuf-4-u
Posted December 24, 2020 - 5:09pm

This one is beautiful, but a mystery to me at present. Here is a site that explains the "hammer with handle" gold hallmark. It apparently can be narrowed down to maker by the number on the hammer head.

Still looking.

Alex
Posted December 25, 2020 - 3:45am

Dear Spartcom5, the period specialist would be me......

Although Swiss hall marked cases of Bulova exist, they are all signed with "Bulova W. Co. ". I am afraid the watch is a Franken. What adds to that suspicion is the combination of dial and movement: the movement is from 1926, but the dial with the gold numbers was introduced by Bulova in 1929. I would pass if you are looking for a genuine Bulova. If you like the watch (and the case is nice!) go ahead for pure decorative value......

Spartcom5
Posted December 25, 2020 - 6:46am

Thank you! I was afraid of that. I'm glad I held off until posting here. I'm not looking to obtain any Franken watches as I value originality over everything! 

mybulova_admin
Posted December 25, 2020 - 6:47pm

I concur with Alex, whilst the case is an absolute beauty, it's like nothing we have seen before. That in of itself does not make it a non Bulova, but the lack of a Bulova stamp an the mix-match movement/dial and hands combo does suggest that its been made up of various parts.

The 10AN is definitely 1926 but again as Alex indicates the dial type wasn't used until a few years later.

However with all that said and done you just never really know with Bulova.

A beauty of a watch nevertheless.

Geoff Baker
Posted December 25, 2020 - 9:55pm

Well, we seem to all be in agreement. My take is the design of the case. Bulova with a couple rare exceptions, even is karat gold stuck to a fixed set of patterns, this is not typical and that it's in a non signed case lend me to an ID of Non Conforming. It certainly is a striking design

neetstuf-4-u
Posted December 25, 2020 - 9:57pm

Agreed, it's a beauty but appears to be a non-conforming.