I will add more photos
This one doesn't look quite right. It appears the dial is a bit to large for the bezel opening. Normally the minute track is set in from the bezel a bit more. It appears that it's partially obscured at the top and bottom. I'm thinking the dial/movement is not original to the case.
I'd like to see a close photo of the front of the watch (engraving detail) and the dial out of the case. It looks to be the shape of the Lone Eagle but I think the steps are smoother like this 1935 Alexander. Note however how the minute track is more visible in the Alexander. The Alexander also appears slightly wider
Are there any numbers on the case back?
In reply to This one doesn't look quite by Geoff Baker
i have compared the photo's carefully and the cases are identical, i think the crown has been changed to make it look more of a ladies watch and the face has been refirbished at some time in its life. i'll also post the case number later today, i would like to post more photos but not sure how to do so. help?
In reply to How do i post more photo's do by dougindoors1957
With the added photos and serial number I'm less sure these parts belong together. The case s/n indicates 1933 and is engraved the same as the Alexander model while the dial seems too large for the bezel opening, the movement code indicates 1937 which seems too great a spread between case and movement.
I'm leaning toward Non-Conforming (which means the watch is a mixture of different components and cannot be identified as a particular model).