Skip to main content

Bulova 1938 Buckingham

6/10 votes
Model ID rating explained.
2.835

Manufacture Year: 

1938

Movement Model: 

!0 AE

Movement Jewels: 

17

Movement Serial No.: 

-

Case Serial No.: 

8712886

Case shape: 

Round

Case Manufacturer: 

Bulova

Gender: 

Ladies

Additional Information

Hi All

I believe this is Practitioner, but the only advert I can find is a one for 1942 which has a different movement (10AX).  the dial and case looks the same. But the movement is a 17 J 10AE which according to the movement info on the db is a 1940 movement. I haven't received the watch as yet and the picture of the movement is not clear enough to make out any date mark.  

 But the case is marked Bulova with a shield after the name. plus serial number 8712886 under that its marked 10K gold filled

 

Not For Sale
Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova Watch
Bulova Watch
jabs
Panel Member
Posted January 31, 2015 - 12:02pm

Agree with Practitioner, ad from 1942

 

bobbee's picture
bobbee
Posted January 31, 2015 - 12:33pm

Case not a match. Bezel in ad has a 'ledge'.

Here is the other example, you can see the difference.

http://www.mybulova.com/watches/1940-practitioner-3315

What you have is the Buckingham, example below with the 1938 ad below that.

http://www.mybulova.com/watches/1939-buckingham-7121

Cheers, Bob.

JP
Posted January 31, 2015 - 12:57pm

Great catch bobbee. Buckingham it is.

donegd
Posted January 31, 2015 - 1:01pm

Bob

I had looked at the Buckingham, l must admit l didn't pick up on the case difference. It was the red on the second hand that made me think it was a practitioner

jabs
Panel Member
Posted January 31, 2015 - 1:10pm

Well I really do not know

donegd
Posted January 31, 2015 - 1:19pm

Is it not that the practitioner was a war time version of the Buckingham. The picture of the practitioner looks very much the same as the subject watch, all apart from the slight difference in the thickness of the bezel

1955mercury's picture
1955mercury
Posted January 31, 2015 - 1:25pm

It's not the Practitioner. You can see it has a bezel ring around the crystal. The lugs don't exactly match the Buckingham. They appear to be shorter and  a little plumper at the tips and the spring bar holes are not exposed on the outside.

jabs
Panel Member
Posted January 31, 2015 - 1:25pm

after comparison of watches that we have in the database I am also inclined to Buckingham

1940 Practitioner

1939 Buckingham

Andersok's picture
Andersok
Panel Member
Posted January 31, 2015 - 6:29pm

Agree with Buckingham

Geoff Baker
Club 5000Panel Member
Posted February 1, 2015 - 6:24am

Buckingham works for me.