Bulova 1940 -Non-Conforming

Submitted by Pangit12 on October 19, 2018 - 9:28am
Manufacture Year
1940
Movement Model
6AF
Movement Jewels
15
Movement Serial No.
-unkonwn
Case Serial No.
7438915
Case shape
Square
Case color
Rose
Case Manufacturer
Other
Crystal details
.733"X.733" slightly domed
Gender
Mens
Watch Description

 The year is probably wrong; the machine would not let me go on without putting something in that block. It is rose gold, 10k, with an Illinois watch co. case. I know the 16mm strap is wrong, but that's what I had available. From what I see on this sight, a 6AF movement seems to be a lady's movement used from 1926-1936, but I see no pictures of anything matching this watch, and it seems too big for a lady's watch. The main spring bridge is badly scratched up, and although the movement caliber is clear enough, the serial number is something like 12338, 12330, or just possibly 1273... I find no date symbol, but under the dial is a mark like an "H" but with ends like cuniform script, not like FHF. After cleaning and lubrication, it is two minutes fast in twenty-four hours. It's really quite beautiful. Can someone help me identify it?

6AF movement mystery year and model
neetstuf-4-u
Posted October 19, 2018 - 9:50am

A photo of the movement showing detail would be of great help. Is the movement stamped Bulova? It should have a date code on the back side. I believe the 6AF was a more rectangular movement, not suited for a square case. I find it in the men's Farragut, Conrad and Phantoms of the 1930's, all are rectangular watches. It's a handsome watch and I know I have seen the face before, so finding a date code and verifying movement would be very beneficial to perhaps narrow down what it may have started life as.

Due to the fact it's in a non-Bulova case, we generally classify such watches as "non-conforming", meaning not all Bulova parts. Wear it and enjoy it.

 

 

mybulova_admin
Posted October 20, 2018 - 9:34pm

Agree, having a photo of the inside or back of case would be very helpful.

Geoff Baker
Posted October 23, 2018 - 6:16am

I like it, I'll always have a thing for rose gold as both of my grandfathers wore rose gold watches. As nice as it is though I would not classify this as a Bulova watch. It seems that it's a combination of a Bulova dial and movement and an Illinois case. 

Reverend Rob
Posted October 24, 2018 - 1:00am

This is the FHF logo, the FHF 332 is what your movt is based on:

 

I have to agree with Geoff, Non-Conforming in the true sense is at least Bulova components, but we have been ID'ing others like this as such. 

neetstuf-4-u
Posted October 24, 2018 - 6:14am

Agreed.

jabs
Posted October 24, 2018 - 6:49am

Non-Conforming for me too

Kathy L.
Posted October 24, 2018 - 11:00am

I agree as well.  A very nice looking watch but Non-Conforming for the ID.

Pangit12
Posted October 27, 2018 - 4:43pm

Non-Conforming it is then.  The movement though is rectangular with a square dial attached.

I am familiar with the FHF logo, and the mark I spoke of is not that; only similar. I will remember the request for a better set of pictures for next time.

Thank you all.