Movement/dial/hands all different to what we know.
Bobbee Based on how it's now published (Engineer), did you vote one tick "Not Confirmed"? I agree it's probably a "Non-Conforming" for model name field rather than Engineer. Rememer a vote of one tick shows disagreement with how it's currently published. If you don't vote at all, then those votes for Engineer are averaged without your one tick (disagreement). I voted one tick as published.
Sorry I haven't been on here, but it does have sunken sub seconds and it does have a date window.
I don't see any ad for an Engineer with a date window. I'm guessing that simply having a date window mvnt/dial in an Engineer case doesn't constitute a differrent model name (so probably not "Unknown" for ID).
IMO this is a "Non-Conforming" watch. Nice Engineer case with non-original Point of Sale mvnt/dial. If we find an ad showing Engineer w/ date window, we can change back from Non-Conforming to Engineer.
So as published now, one tick for "Not Confirmed" (as Bobbee also suggested above).