This was one of my grandfathers bulova's
M1 date code, solid 14k case, self winding...
What is it?
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk302/Sask-MH/PA070012.jpg
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk302/Sask-MH/PA070011.jpg
The band is not original...The original band (which I do have) is a gold plated stainless band.
Sorry, I do have pics of the back, There are also some very very small markings on the backside (engraved in the case) I am taking it to a jewler today to look closely at it.
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk302/Sask-MH/PA070012.jpg
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk302/Sask-MH/PA070015.jpg
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk302/Sask-MH/PA070014.jpg
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk302/Sask-MH/PA070013.jpg
In reply to I missed the 14K stamp. Did by Wayne Hanley
In reply to Im not seeing it, but it by shooter144
Sorry, the strap is not original. the original strap is a gold plated/stainless expandable type.
I did find a photo which has identical features/design but an earlier model in different material.
Differencees between mine and the senator above:
Mine - 14 k case, dial has silver/white textured outer ring with charcoal center, the shape and style of the numbers and markers are the same hoever my markers and numbers are gold, hour/minute hands are gold with radium, only single luminous dot at 12 position, second hand is gold and differs slightly in shape.
Sorry, but I've never seen a 14K Bulova with a stainless back and I've never seen one only stamped inside the case, So you don't have a 14k case, the back is stainless! They are usually stamped on the outside 14k Gold, and inside would say Bulova, Fifth Ave, New York. Some Accutrons used a stainless locking ring but the back is still gold and marked as such. I doubt very much this is 14K due to the back and the lack of pictures showing the entire back with all it's markings. On top of that the pics you have provided show mild wear through along the lugs bottom edges which confirm worn gold plate. I'd bet it's a 17 Jewel selfwinder common to the period and is probably marked 10k Rolled Gold Plate, Stainless Back, inside.
If you think I'm off base here, your challenge of the day is to produce the pictures that prove this watch is 14K and prove me wrong! BUT YOU won't be able to, because The watch is not 14K gold.
Ellierose, the info posted on this site is used for positive identification purposes, discovering the name and or model with accurate info, not speculation. Therefor accurate info is imperative. I realize your a little upset with this site because of the reaction to your other post, but try to understand that the site admin. based on consensus of members, doesn't allow reference to any active EBay auctions for a reason. That reason is, if Allowed, every seller who has a Bulova watch up for auction would post it here and flood this site with sales or free advertising if you will. This site wasn't designed for that, it's for research and discovery, not sales!
In reply to Ellierose, the info posted on by simpletreasures
I care, if Sportee says this watch is solid gold, I want to be able to tell it's solid gold. I want to see a picture of the stamp in this media. The first thing that this member says about the watch is solid gold. I guarantee he won't sell it to me.
Ya Wanna Buy a Watch?
The price of gold closed down today @ $1,664 per ounce. Down $10.00 an ounce from yesterday!
i understand what this forum is used for...but the point was that instead of just the beauty of the watch and what it is the talk was about the gold...not the model....and mostly when people want to know if their watch is gold or not, most of the time it is to make a quick buck and or just scrap the case...
and about the user agreement first of all i don't really remember 8months ago on something that i probably just skimmed over like most of the people here problem did simple...did you ever read the whole user agreement on anything, everyprogram every internet site every app...if you say you did i would find that very very very hard to believe...and you can tell the case isn't soild gold...it has a !@#@#$#@ stainless steel back to it..if anything it would be a solid gold bezel
WHATEVER OPINONS PEOPLE HAVE THAT IS GREAT..BTW I LOVE THIS SITE IF I WAS SOMEONE HOW SOLD AND BOUGHT AND OWN BULOVA WATCHES WITHOUT WANTING TO KNOW INFORMATION, HISTORY,AGE AND NAME..THEN I WOULD BE A SAP...THIS FORUM ALLOWS ME TO GET THE INFO AND I AM HAPPY THAT IT EXIST...AND THAT USERS HERE INCLUDING ME ADD TO THAT INFORMATION...ITS JUST WHEN I SEE PEOPLE TALK ABOUT IF SOMETHING IS GOLD I THINK THEY JUST SEE DOLLAR SIGNS...THE QUESTION SHOULD HAVE BEEN WHAT MODEL THIS IS AND DID IT COME WITH A GOLD BEZEL...
In reply to WHATEVER OPINONS PEOPLE HAVE by Ellierose
In reply to WHATEVER OPINONS PEOPLE HAVE by Ellierose
Ellierose, part of what makes this website great (IMO) are the members who participate in the forum discussions. A vital part of these discussions comes from members asking questions to gain a detailed understanding of the watch in question. In many circumstances the Gold content of a watch does in deed help narrow down a certain model of a watch and I highly doubt that members of this site are asking such questions for monetary reasons.
If you have been in this business long enough with collecting and trying to identify vintage Bulova watches you will no doubt understand the importantance of these small details.
I would dearly like to know what other websites are bagging this site. Hey they have their right to, but I'll put that down to professional jealousy. This site has some wonderful members, both passionate and knowledgeable and IMO these 2 factors make this website a very useful tool for anyone looking for information about vintage Bulova watches.
Like any online forum people have a right to express their opinions, I just ask that on myBulova.com they do so in a kind and polite manner.
Thank you.
All CORRECT information is very relevent in making a positive ID on a watch, It helps those of us that dam near have every ad memorized know where to look.
In this era of a watch, most 14K solid cases are 21 or higher jewel count and all we have to go on is 14K, Selfwinding, and M1 with only case and dial pictures.
As much info as possible is needed for a correct ID right down to the size of the crystal, and the old saying "a picture is worth a thousand words" applies here on all ID's.
Right now my guess is that it is a 17J Clipper of some sorts and that it does not have a solid 14K bezel.
Greg
In reply to All CORRECT information is by OldTicker
The Tuxedo being a perfect example of how important gold content is, Tuxedo is solid, but shares the exact case as another named watch that is rgp (rgp model name slips my mind at the moment but I believe its an Excellancy series) and that differance is huge. If someone takes the time to try and research a vintage watch, we feel we should provide accurate info if at all possible. No one here makes anything from this site($) in fact it costs money for admin and those of us who donate to keep it going, not to mention countless hours of time.
In reply to The Tuxedo being a perfect by shooter144
My apologies for stirring things up so much. I did not mean to say that it is without a doubt a solid gold watch. Rather i wanted to see if I could confirm or not. The back is stainless, however the bezel/case are one solid piece which I was told are 14K. This is what an old family friend who was a retired jewler/watchsmith told my father when he serviced it for us back in 2001. I would like to confirm one way or another but it is not a big deal as it is not something I am going to sell...I don't care about value. (I won't comment on the "rants")
I managed to get the back off tonight. The back does not say 14K but rather "stainless steel back" and I did not find any 14k markings inside (although I was not able to take the movement out as I was not able to remove the crown) .
With regards to the "worn lugs" that seems to be an illusion of the photos. I had two high end jewelers look very closely at it today and they both agreed that if it is plated there is no wear through.
Now for what I found inside. (I will post some pictures tomorrow)
On the pendulum are the following markings inlayed with gold:
23 JEWELS
TWENTY THREE
BULOVA WATCH Co
11ACAC
SWISS
M1
ADJUSTED
That helped!
2 or maybe 3 choices known so far as ID's go on a watch dated M1
1. Bulova 23
2. Regetta
3. Beau Brumell
His Excellency's were also 23J in that era, but they always have sub seconds dials.
As far as if the bezel is solid 14K, an acid scratch test to the inside of the bezel or backside of a lug would tell you in a hurry.
In reply to That helped! 2 or maybe 3 by OldTicker
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk302/Sask-MH/2011-10-11193640.jpg
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk302/Sask-MH/2011-10-11193857.jpg
Here are some pics of the inside.
I did manage to find the 14k stamp. Apparently when the fellow told us "inside" he meant inside the lugs. It is marked on the inside of one of the lugs. (I finally took the strap off for a closer look) The holes for the wristband pins were filled and re-drilled and the gold solder? filled the stamp. You can see it with a loupe - i'm trying to get a photo of it for you folks but i'm having troubles getting my camera to focus that close...
Anyways, aside from the 14k/plated issue...I just want to ID the model.
Thanks.
In reply to http://i283.photobucket.com/a by sportee
In reply to Use the MACRO setting if your by shooter144
In reply to Ive tried Macro but no good. by sportee
Most camera MACRO settings with autofocus require extreme steadiness to focus, ie a tripod..if you are not using one that could be the issue. Mine will look in focus but shot WILL be blurred if I dont ure a tripod. Hope that is the issue lol easy $10 fix if it is.
Compare the 1957 Senator dial (middle) features that are a match e.g. font shape of numbers & batons, the circular outline. I have seen Senator varient dials with the black cloth material in the center like this. The hands are identical in shape. The cases are the same shape as the 1960 Senator ad watch (right). I think Sportee's watch is a Senator model with a 14K solid gold case. Notice the deep luster & depth in the gold case, great to see that in a photo.
In reply to WoW Wayne lol ya had to say by shooter144
The senator was the closest match I could find too.
but...the movement 11ACAC (as far as I can find) was only in the Royal Clipper.
And...the Senator and Clipper were 17 jewel movements (as far as I can find). Mine is a 23J movement with a matching date code - would this be correct for a Senator?
Oh, and this was likely purchased in Germany (if it matters at all) as that was where my grandftather was stationed at the time.
In reply to The senator was the closest by sportee
When you buy a solid gold watch from a jewler he will be happy to give you anything you want. At the time this watch was made, the case, dial & movement were all available & as fumble fingered as I am, could put that watch together. If I were you I would be happy with the custom Senator name than a Frankenbully.
Have aGreat myBulova day!
The lugs don't have the little notches where they meet the case like the Senator has.
They are more (smooth) like the case on this 1963 Regatta 23 http://www.mybulova.com/watches/1963-regatta-23-2744
Gold cases are always given a bit more quality control than SS. Here are the measurements of my Senator. Diameter 31.7mm w/o crown, 38.8mm Lug-to-Lug, 16mm between lugs. Measure your watch & compare notes.
In comparing your case (left) to the Regatta case (right). Focus on the cases at the 2 o'clock position to the top of the lug. On unkown (left) the case edge going to the lug tip appears to be rounded. Where as theRegatta (right) appears to taper in slightly from 2 o'clock to the lug tip. If it is a Regatta, how do you explain the Senator dial?
In reply to Gold cases are always given a by Wayne Hanley
In reply to I see, I agree the Senator by sportee
Hello all,
If I could chime in for a second. If the watch has a stainless back, could it be possible that at some point the back could have been changed out for some reason (damaged, had a unsightly engraving, or accident), and replaced with the less expensive stainless one. They should fit, and it could happen. I picked up a Accutron 218D several years ago on ebay. It had a 14K RGPback on it. Guess what? When I replaced the band on it, I found the 14K Mark between the lugs. Had it tested and she is solid! I have since found a decent gold back for it, and it is currently in the shop for a repair (the date wheel suddenly stopped). Needless to say I got a GREAT deal on that watch.....
In reply to Hello all, If I could by firebaron90
I don't have my calipers here but using a drafting scale I get roughly 32mm o/a dia., 38.5mm lug tip to lug tip and 17.2mm between the lugs. So the measurements are pretty close.
Ive read that the 11ACAC movement was a unique Bulova winding design (especially with 23 jewels), and that some watches for german and italian markets were not available elsewhere. If this is true it might explain everything quite nicely. I know my grandfather was not one to piece a watch (or anything for that matter) together. He had a few different self winding watches (Bulova's, Timex). When one stopped working or broke the crystal he just picked up another.
Although you never know ;)
What kind of quality was a senator known for. It seems to be a cheaper (priced) watch in the old adds but the 23J movement watches seem to be quite the opposite at the time.
In reply to I don't have my calipers here by sportee
Wayne, can you send some pics of your Senator for comparison. The only photos I can find of the round case version is the photo posted above. The 1955 add also calls it a senator FW (although not a 23J model or gold case)
http://www.mybulova.com/sites/default/files/watches/Bulova_AD_1955_2.jp…
what is FW?
Chad.
Chad
My Senator is in the database. Those are the only pictures I have. The measurement of the case should have proven the case match or not, + or - a few mm should prove to you what the case design is. You have to be comfortable with that.
As far as ads go, we have what we ave & that is the weakness of Bulova ID. I'm positive Bulova didn't advertise all of their watches at one time or another. A lot of folks here will not even attempt an ID unless a matching ad can be found. The perfect ID for this watch would be a 1961 ad for a Senator stating also avaiable in 14k, and list all the dial variants & movements. Senators were available in different varients. And also in a tonneau case. I don't ever recall a Senator offered in an ad with a 23 jewel movement. I do remember bidding on a late 50s Senator with a black cloth dial similar to your dial. I think the case & dial are Senator. The only loose end I feel is the 23 jewel movement. If you find that you ID the watch without a doubt. At this point why not contact Bulova & you might come up with some info.
In reply to Chad My Senator is in the by Wayne Hanley
I didn't realize that photo was your Senator. I saw it in another thread and thought it belonged to someone else.
I agree with your statements...It is definitely a senator dial. I did find another photo on the web of the same gold case as well with a plain white senator dial so it appears that this was an available option. (that watch in particular came out of Gernamy as well) As you say, the 23J movement is the only loose end.
As I mentioned this is a watch that I wear now and then and will continue to wear. I only hoped to find out what model it is and you've done that for me. I greatly appreicate your taking the time to help me out with this one. Thank you.
Chad.
Here's another one that I found with the same dial.
a 59 model, push out case, manual wind. Just the same dial.
http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk302/Sask-MH/1959Bulova.jpg