Found this last week at a thrift store, hence know nothing about its history. Movement: 10COAC, 30 jewel - Movement Date Code: M9 - 1969 - Case Date Code: N4 - 1974 - Unfortunately my camera is not sophisticated enough to capture these date codes, sorry. On 26 February 2015 ChefBenjamin posted a watch cosmetically identical to mine: http://www.mybulova.com/watches/1973-unknown-7246 - I would be willing to wager that his watch is mechanically identical too. But it went unresolved as to whether his watch was an authentic Commander because he could not post a photo of the movement. My watch does has a 30 jewel 10 COAC movement as did all of the Commanders. My watch also has a Commander AQ gold plated case. The only difference between my watch and the 1960s Commanders is the dial and hands, updated to a more current 1970s style. And my dial does not say 30 Jewels. Is my watch authentic Commander?
Most curious.
It appears clear that Bulova re-stamped the movt, for issue with the watch in 1974.
OR
Bulova was utilizing older parts. The part that is stamped in this case is the barrel bridge. It is possible that this is the only part that is actually 1969. Either way, I say it is legit, I'm leaning toward Commander, unknown variant for now.
I'm fascinated by the double date stamp shown on this watch, so many questions! This might be an opportunity for us. I suggest that this ID be updated consistent with the ID we assign rterra's watch.
In reply to I'm fascinated by the double by Geoff Baker
A big thank you to everyone that contributed to this thread. It took only 5-1/2 years to correctly identify this watch, but you all nailed it. Special thanks to @JimDon5822.
Sadly, somebody stole my watch. If anyone sees this watch, please let me know. I would like to get it back.
The case serial is unique and identifiable, but the double date stamp on the barrel bridge makes it intriguing and special.
Slim chance of seeing it again, I know. But worth mentioning.
Thanks again.
jshopper1