Bulova 1972 DIAMOND STARBURST "A" - This Bulova Ladies watch is 14K White Gold with four (4) Diamonds with a mesh band. Inside case is stamped: 14K GOLD, L & W, M246 - Outside case is stamped: 14K, BULOVA, 113552, N2
Diamond Starburst refers to the model collection as a whole , while "Starburst "A" refers to the specific watch in the collection.
Either/or works for me as long as we stay consistent in the future.
Perhaps the initial name in the model drop down list should be "Diamond Starburst" instead of "Starburst" as the ad referenced calls them out as such. Then list subcategories as "Diamond Starburst" (generic unk variant) followed by "Starburst A, B, C" and so on. Make sense for organization?
Panel?
In reply to Diamond Starburst refers to by neetstuf-4-u
I agree with you. Per the ad it seems it is a Diamond Starburst collection and the individual watches are Starburst "variant". If there was a watch where a variant could not be named would it be a generic Starburst or Diamond Starburst? I think whatever we decide that would be is how we should name the ones with the variant as well to keep it consistent. Those are my thoughts anyway. I am happy with whatever the consensus is.
In reply to I agree with you. Per the ad by Kathy L.
My thinking is that it is entirely possible there are unknowns out there with and without diamonds that could be "Diamond Starburst" as well as just plain "Starburst" without diamonds. Ads from the 70's are sparse, so it's a pretty gray area.
If a watch that matches one in the collection surfaces without diamonds, it could be a plain "Starburst". If one appears that matches shape, age and jewel count but is a different color than available ads, it's a generic "Diamond Sunburst".
It appears the variant letters go at least as far as A-H, and ads state available in different colors. If they match an ad (shape, color, jewel count), they get a variant, if not, generic "Diamond Sunburst" until we determine variant progression based on shape/color.
Make sense?
In reply to My thinking is that it is by neetstuf-4-u
In reply to Yes makes sense. Then I by Kathy L.
